History 340 Critical Periods in  United States History:  The 1890s
Roger Williams University
CAS 228
MWF 12:00 - 12:50
Fall Semester, 2007
Michael R. H. Swanson, Ph. D.
Office:  Feinstein College 110
Hours:  T,  9:00 - 10:00:
MWF, 1:00-2:00 or by appointment
254-3230
E.mail: Swanson1890s@msn.com
C;lick for hard copy edition.
Index
For Monday, September 3.



Are you going to be here?  I’m not. 
It’s Labor Day.  I’ll be winging my
way back from Minneapolis, where
I’ve been wishing my Aunt Gladys
a Happy 100th birthday

Good looks run in the family, right?
For Wednesday, September 5

Read,
in Fink,
#1, Andrew Carnegie Hails the Triumph of Capitalism        18-20
#2, Henry George Dissects the Paradox of Economic Growth    20-22
#3, The Reverend Alexander Lewis Offers an Ode to Upward Mobility23

Click to read Andrew Carnegie's Gospel of Wealth, Published in the North American Review in 1889
Click to visit an abridged version of George's most famous work:  Progress and Poverty
Andrew Carnegie and Henry George look at the economic machine from widely differing perspectives. Interestingly, both men rose from very humble origins to positions of fame and prominence. In Carnegie's case, one can add wealth to the list of his triumphs.




George, on the other hand became a public icon for those who greeted the new economy with suspicion. Alexander Lewis's short poem is the kind of thing which teachers at the turn of the century might encourage their students to memorize. (I won't force that on any of you... but if you have invented an appropriate character you may want to learn this "by heart." How does one become rich? Lewis provides what becomes the standard American answer for a century or more.

For  Friday, September 7

Read, in Fink,
The Machine as Deity and Demon (Trachtenberg) 27 - 34
Class Consciousness, American Style (Fink) 34 - 45

As Trachtenberg's title suggests, some Americans worshipped the machine age while others saw it as threatening core values. I'm sure there were some Americans which held both of these views simultaneously. Trachtenberg looks at the way intellectuals (including Henry George, whom you met on Wednesday) analyzed the emerging machine culture. Some of them, like Frederick Taylor, (his portrait appears at the left) created a "cult of efficiency," while others pondered the human costs.


As capital became more concentrated and as fortunes reached ever greater sums, the social distance between rich and poor became greater and greater. Carnegie and Lewis espoused a belief than anyone could better himself or herself through diligence, sacrifice, and hard work. The growing power of the "Captains of Industry" seemed likely to overwhelm individual working men and women, however. How could any of them compete successfully with Carnegie and his like? One possible response was labor organization, and this one of the themes of Fink's essay. American Labor behaves differently from European Labor, however, and Fink wants us to consider why American "working classes" respond to industrial change and social crisis in a way different from their European counterparts.
Reminder:  Look for links...you'll find them both in text and lurking behind pictures.  Some of them may be very useful to you
Carnegie proposed a 100% inheritance tax, arguing that only through that method could everyone compete on a level playing field.  What do you think?
Puck Magazine satirizes a Knights of Labor Parade, c. 1886.  Click on the image to access other labor cartoons and posters from the late 19th and early 20th century.
How is your alter-ego coming along?  You want to settle on this in broad outlines A.S.A.P., in order to avoid having to go back over  too many assigned readings in order to catch up.